Writing Question

Please make sure that you read each competency and make sure everything is included and cited correctly.

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Write a 1012 page analysis paper, using the community college case scenario, about events at the colleges that includes the following: Senges four core disciplines (personal mastery, mental models, shared vision, and team learning), organizational disabilities, systems archetypes, and a systems map; Paul and Elder’s critical thinking tools; Strohs four-stage change process, the AIP action research process, critical thinking questions for stakeholders, and recommendations for the college president.

Use this case study about community colleges in Florida as the scenario for your analysis:

• .

Using the community college case scenario, write a 1012 page analysis paper about events at the colleges that includes the following: Senges four core disciplines (personal mastery, mental models, shared vision, and team learning), organizational disabilities, systems archetypes, and a systems map; Paul and Elder’s critical thinking tools; Strohs four-stage change process, and the AIP action research process. Include critical thinking questions for stakeholders, and recommendations for the college president.

• Introduce the case.
  • Preliminary Introduction of the Case: Summarize the case. Provide a synopsis of the Community College case that enables the intended audience to understand the events, stakeholders, and challenges that will be analyzed.
• Use disciplines of learning organizations to analyze problems of practice.
  • Disciplines: Apply the lens of Senge’s four core disciplines (personal mastery, mental models, team learning, and shared vision) to the case and provide an analysis of the extent to which each discipline reveals organizational dynamics and contributes to organizational learning or addresses the organizations problems.
• Analyze the organizational disabilities and systems archetypes present in the case.
  • Organizational Disabilities: Describe how at least one organizational disability is represented by events in the scenario.
  • Systems Archetypes: Explain and map at least one example of a systems archetype evident in the case. Include at least one systems map, labeled with events from the scenario, as part of your presentation.
• Recommend change management strategies for the organization based on the case.
  • Critical Thinking Tools: Before suggesting change management strategies, identify critical thinking tools that will help stakeholders clarify the challenges they are facing.
  • Four-Stage Change Process: Describe and explain Stroh’s four-stage process could be used by the Community College leaders to improve the strategic planning process that enhances the chances of success for proposed initiatives. Refer to Stroh’s Thinking for Social Change text.
• Propose an inquiry model to plan for next phase of organizational improvement.
  • Inquiry Cycle: Demonstrate and explain how an inquiry model such as the AIP model could be used by the college leadership to plan the next phase of improvement or change.
  • Recommendations: Provide a set of specific and practical recommendations about how the college leadership should proceed. Demonstrate how your recommendations align with the Community Colleges mission, vision, and values.
  • Questions: Conclude with at least three discussion questions you would pose to help community college stakeholders reflect on the concepts presented so they can collaborate with the college leadership about future continuous organizational improvement.

THIS IS WHAT YOU NEED TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE INCLUDING IN THE PAPER

CRITERION 1

Provide a synopsis of the case that enables the intended audience to understand the case, including events, stakeholders, or challenges that will be analyzed.

Distinguished

Provides a well-crafted and organized synopsis of the case that enables the intended audience to understand the case, including events, stakeholders, and challenges that will be analyzed.

Proficient

Provides a synopsis of the case that enables the intended audience to understand the case, including events, stakeholders, and challenges that will be analyzed.

CRITERION 2

Apply the lens of Senge’s four core disciplines (personal mastery, mental models, team learning, and shared vision) to the case, and analyze the extent to which each discipline reveals organizational dynamics and contributes to organizational learning or addresses the organizations problems.

Distinguished

Applies the lens of Senge’s four core disciplines, and provides an insightful, comprehensive analysis of the extent to which each discipline reveals organizational dynamics and contributes to organizational learning or addresses the organizations problems.

Proficient

Applies the lens of Senge’s four core disciplines, and analyzes the extent to which each discipline reveals organizational dynamics and contributes to organizational learning or addresses the organizations problems.

CRITERION 3

Analyze the organizational disabilities and systems archetypes present in the case, including at least one systems map aligned to events from the scenario.

Distinguished

Analyzes the organizational disabilities and systems archetypes present in the case, including at least one systems map, aligned to events from the scenario using specific evidence from the case.

Proficient

Analyzes the organizational disabilities and systems archetypes present in the case, including at least one systems map aligned to events in the scenario. .

CRITERION 4

Create a set of questions to uncover stakeholders assumptions and facilitate inquiry into and understanding of the key concepts presented.

Distinguished

Creates a set of questions to uncover stakeholders assumptions and facilitate inquiry into and understanding of the key concepts presented and explains why the questions will be effective.

Proficient

Creates a set of questions to uncover stakeholders assumptions and facilitate inquiry into and understanding of the key concepts presented.

CRITERION 5

Explain how Stroh’s four-stage change process could be applied to the case.

Distinguished

Explains how Stroh’s four-stage change process could be applied to the case, providing examples, citations, or other supporting evidence.

Proficient

Explains how Stroh’s four-stage change process could be applied to the case.

CRITERION 6

Present an action plan based on an inquiry model, such as AIP/action research, and explain how it could be used by the college leadership to plan, implement, and evaluate the next phase of improvement or change.

Distinguished

Presents an action plan based on the AIP/action research process, and explains how it could be used by the college leadership to plan, implement, and evaluate the next phase of improvement or change, providing examples, citations, or other supporting evidence.

Proficient

Presents an action plan based on the AIP/action research process, and explains how it could be used by the college leadership to plan, implement, and evaluate the next phase of improvement or change.

CRITERION 7

Recommend ways the college leadership should proceed that align with the colleges mission, vision, and values.

Distinguished

Recommends ways the college leadership should proceed that align with the colleges mission, vision, and values, providing examples, citations, or other supporting evidence.

Proficient

Recommends ways the college leadership should proceed that align with the colleges mission, vision, and values.

CRITERION 8

Communicate clearly, supporting main ideas with examples from the scenario. Demonstrate a scholarly writing style, using correct grammar, usage, mechanics, and APA formatting.

Distinguished

Communicates exceptionally clearly, including evidence from the scenario to support main ideas in a logical analysis. Demonstrates scholarly writing style, with consistently correct grammar, usage, mechanics, and APA formatting.

Proficient

Communicates clearly, supporting main ideas with examples from the scenario. Demonstrate scholarly writing style, using correct grammar, usage, mechanics, and APA formatting.

USE PANGRAM.COM TO SUBMIT THE PAPER AND MAKE SURE IT IS 100 PERCENT HUMAN AND 0 PERCENT AI