Philosophy Question

In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you already know.

Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs. Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and discuss the opposing argument. Also, discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view.

To complete each scenario assignment:

1. Complete the entire scenario.i sent a pdf of it below.
2. Fill out the template attached below, ask your professor for details on submission.
3. Compose the last question on the template reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions:

• Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
• Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?
• Which ethical theory would you use to support your stance? Why does this theory work?

1. Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
2. Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources.
3. Review the rubric for specific grading criteria

Grading Rubric

1. Identification of Main Issues (20 pts)

Meets Expectations (2015.8 pts)
Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues in the scenario.

Approaches Expectations (15.811.8 pts)
Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of some of the issues in the scenario.

Does Not Meet Expectations (11.80 pts)
Does not demonstrate an acceptable understanding of the issues in the scenario.

2. Links to Course Readings and Additional Research (20 pts)

Meets Expectations (2015.8 pts)
Makes clear and strong connections between identified issues and course concepts from readings and presentations. Supports reflection with relevant, thoughtful research. Properly documents all sources and includes evidence and specific examples from the textbook. Incorporates at least one ethical theory to support arguments.

Approaches Expectations (15.811.8 pts)
Makes some connections between identified issues and course concepts, but they may be vague. Includes limited research support.

Does Not Meet Expectations (11.80 pts)
Makes little or no connection between identified issues and course concepts. Research is incomplete, missing, or poorly documented.

3. Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines (10 pts)

Meets Expectations (107.9 pts)
Follows current APA format consistently. Writing is clear and free of grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. All sources are correctly cited and referenced.

Approaches Expectations (7.95.9 pts)
Generally follows APA format with minor inconsistencies. Contains a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited correctly.

Does Not Meet Expectations (5.90 pts)
Does not follow APA format. Contains frequent grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Sources are incorrectly cited or missing.

dont forget, everything needa apa 7th edition format including in text cite+refernces. send me ai and grammer and spelling report as well.